Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Halsell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1912No. 2045PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee Coimty; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by C. B. Lynch and Jay Forsyth, copartners as Lynch & Forsyth, against E. L. Halsell. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

Suit on debt. This suit was tried in 'the superior court of Muskogee county October 21, 1909, by the court; a jury having been waived by the parties. The court found the issues in favor of the defendant, and that he go hence with his costs. From this judgment, the plaintiffs below, as plaintiffs in error here, appeal.

The plaintiffs for their cause of action alleged that in June, 1907, they had paid to the Tulsa Street Railway Company $427.45 for the defendant, under an oral contract so to> do, and that he would reimburse them therefor. The defendant filed general denial.

At…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McCann v. McCannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Kaufman v. BoismierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BroeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Wade v. CornishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington County Abstract Company v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Chickasha St. Ry. Co. v. WundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Gault v. ThurmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Miller v. SeversSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. McConnell v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API