Chickasha St. Ry. Co. v. Wund
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Superior Court, Qrady County; Will Linn, Judge. Action by Mrs. Effie Wund against the Chickasha Street Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, -and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion -by
ROBERTSON, 0.
Plaintiff below recovered a judgment in the sum of $500 against defendant on account of injuries received in alighting from a street car. ' The street railway company appeals, and urges two propositions as reasons for a reversal. They are: First, that the evidence does not reasonably tend to support the verdict of the jury; and, second, that the charge of the court, as mentioned and set out, particularly in the third, fourth, and fifth assignments of error, eliminates from the consideration of the jury the question of contributory negligence.
The proper consideration of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- City of Wynnewood v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hilsmeyer v. BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Kennedy v. Pawnee Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Brissey v. TrotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Long v. Ponca City Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Abbott v. DingusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Looney v. County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Ferris v. ShandySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Campbell v. BreeceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.