Legal Opinion
McConnell v. Watkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 1914No. 3537PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from County Court, Osage County; C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action by F. M. Watkins against W. G. McConnell. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RITTENHOUSE, C.
This is an action to re-plevin a three year old dark gray filly, of the value of $50. Issues were joined, the cause was tried to a jury, and verdict returned as follows:
“We, the jury, impaneled and sworn to try the issues in the above-entitled cause, do, upon our oaths, find the issues for the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff at the commencement of said action was the owner and entitled to the immediate possession of one three year old dark gray filly. Pat Lynn, Foreman.”
Judgment was rendered on-this verdict, and motion for a new trial overruled.
The assignments of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Wey v. City Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Brissey v. TrotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Farwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Crum v. EllistonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bunker v. HardingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Mitchell v. DadasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Incorporated Town of Comanche v. WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- McKemie v. AlbrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.