Legal Opinion

Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1980No. Docket Nos. 60752, 60759, 60826, 60839. (Calendar Nos. 7-10)PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

We granted leave to appeal to determine the effect of the doctrine of res judicata upon these workers’ compensation claims.

*159Justice Williams has stated the facts in both cases.

I

The parties do not question that the doctrine of res judicata applies to workers’ compensation proceedings; they differ only as to its scope. Plaintiffs assert that only those claims actually litigated in a prior proceeding are barred from relitigation. Defendants argue that res judicata bars those claims actually litigated and also those arising out of the same transaction which plaintiff could have brought in the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Dressler v. Grand Rapids Die Casting Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hlady v. Wolverine Bolt Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Dart v. DartMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City Communications, Inc. v. The City of Detroit Barden Cable-Vision and MacLeanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sewell v. Clean Cut Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Socialist Workers Party v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API