Legal Opinion

Null v. Siegrist

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident involving vehicles driven by plaintiff and defendant. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1 general damages and $256 special damages. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered on the verdict.

Plaintiff presents only two assignments of error. First, he contends that the court erred in preventing him from going “into the matter of insurance” to show that his first treating physician, Dr, Brackebusch, was being paid by defendant’s insurance carrier, and because of this fact the plaintiff changed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fischer v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Smith v. Pacific Truck ExpressOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Saum v. BonarOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Edmonds v. ERIONOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Brannan v. SlempOregon Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Smith v. JC Penney Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Building Structures, Inc. v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wheeler v. HustonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Brewer v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Kriner v. WeaverOregon Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API