Legal Opinion

Brewer v. Erwin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1984No. A7604 04893, A7709 12910 (Supplemental) CA 19391PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

This case is before us on both parties’ applications for clarification of our original opinion, Brewer v. Erwin, 61 Or App 642, 658 P2d 1180, rev den 294 Or 792 (1983).

In that opinion, we reversed and remanded with instructions to the trial court to “reinstate the jury verdict.” 61 Or App at 649. On remand, Presiding Judge Crookham was confronted with conflicting arguments of plaintiff and defendant relating to the date from which interest was to accrue on plaintiff s judgment. The point of contention is the wording in our opinion instructing the trial court to “reinstate the jury verdict.”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gow v. Multnomah Hotel, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Livesley v. Krebs Hop Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Huston v. Trans-Mark Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Null v. SiegristOregon Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
  2. Brewer v. ErwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. State v. VentrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. John W. Brown Properties v. Blaine CountyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Roseburg Investments, LLC v. House of Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API