Legal Opinion
Smallpage v. Turlock Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1938No. Civ. 5990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff as the owner of certain lands against the Turlock Irrigation District and the City of Turlock to quiet title to certain lands.
Between lots 13 and 14 and lots 11, 12 and 17 of Robosson Colony No. I, in the county of Stanislaus, is a strip of land 80 feet in width, over and across which are certain drainage canals; one used by the Turlock Irrigation District as a drainage canal and the other used by the City of Turlock as a drainage canal and as a sewerage outlet. This part of the sewerage system of the City of Turlock extends from the city farm for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Empire Gold Mining Co. v. Bonanza Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1885
- Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Vowinckel v. N. Clark & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Hardin v. ElvitskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Distefano v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.