Legal Opinion
Roberts & Lloyd, Inc. v. Zyblut
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1997No. 94-CV-1215PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This appeal presents three questions: 1) Whether the presumption that a married couple owning property jointly hold it as a tenancy by the entireties applies to the joint brokerage accounts at issue in this case, 2) whether a Keogh retirement account owned by a self-employed individual is exempt from garnishment by the owner’s creditors, and 3) whether the trial court’s determination that the creditor failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that there was a transfer of property with the intent of defrauding or hindering creditors, was clearly erroneous or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murray v. GadsdenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Harrington v. EmmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Coleman v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Settle v. SettleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Massengale v. PittsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Arthur v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Morrison v. PotterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Fields v. TillersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barrett v. Chreky (In Re Chreky)District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.