Legal Opinion
Massengale v. Pitts
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 1999No. 97-CV-1169PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant Minda Massengale, and appel-lee, Marteal Pitts, were involved in an automobile accident at the intersection of 13th Street and Michigan Avenue, N.E. Minda Massengale sued Pitts for damages resulting from the collision, and her husband, Jack Massengale, sued for loss of consortium. Following a bench trial, the court found that Pitts had been negligent and Massengale contributorily negligent at the time the accident occurred. Judgment was entered for Pitts and against the Mas-sengales on both Minda Massengale’s negligence claim and her husband’s loss of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Sinai v. Polinger Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Romer v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stutsman v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hill v. Medlantic Health Care GroupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lans v. Adduci Mastriani & Schaumberg L.L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hundley Ex Rel. Estate Hundley v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Convit v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.