Settle v. Settle
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The appellant and appellee arc husband and wife, and the sole question in the case is whether either one is entitled to a partition of certain real estate situate within the District of Columbia, now owned by them in undivided interests.
The title to the property was acquired by the parlies during coverture by conveyances from Joseph H. Amberger and wife. On August 1.1, 1919, a written contract was executed by and between the Ambergers and Harry Thomas Settle, the appellant, whereby upon certain considerations the former cQvenanted to convey said property to the latter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hoag v. HoagMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Fladung v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
3Cited by29 opinions
- Coleman v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Fairclaw v. ForrestCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- In Re Wall.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Webster v. Hope (In Re Hope)District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- David v. NemerofskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.