Legal Opinion
Arthur v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 9, 2004No. 00-CV-1389, 00-CV-1413PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReid, Associate J.
This case involves very contentious, labyrinthine litigation relating not only to marital property belonging to appellant Morris Arthur and his wife, Christine Arthur, but also to questions pertaining to interest on sums of money deposited initially in the court registry but later transferred to the District of Columbia Treasurer. Specifically, the issues presented in this appeal concern the trial court’s decision to vacate the entry of default against Ms. Arthur in one aspect of the litigation, the relative equities of Mr. and Ms. Arthur in their marital property, and the interest earned, if…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Riverside Hospital v. District of Columbia Department of HealthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Watergate East Committee Against Hotel Conversion to Co-Op Apartments v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Luna v. A.E. Engineering Services, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ricardo Hernandez v. Bryant BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.