Legal Opinion
Naftalis v. Rankin
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 16, 1976No. 4938PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.
Dr. J. M. Naftalis, Dr. R. D. Martin, Gene S. Friedman, and E. F. Lisle sued Robert E. Rankin and the Permian Corporation to (1) impress a constructive trust upon an undivided three-fourths interest in an oil and gas lease upon land situated in Knox County; (2) recover the net income received by *895Rankin attributable to the undivided three-fourths interest; and (3) recover from the pipeline company, the Permian Corporation, the money held in suspense.
Plaintiffs alleged that they and defendant, Rankin, became partners in a mining partnership in the Melton lease; that…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rankin v. NaftalisTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Gum v. Schaefer, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
- Naftalis v. RankinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Rankin v. NaftalisTexas Supreme Court · 1977