Legal Opinion

Gum v. Schaefer

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 13, 1984No. 13-84-092-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Gary and Dorothy Gum, appellants, sued Richard Schaefer, alleging breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud. It is undisputed that Gary Gum and Rich ard Schaefer were equal partners in a partnership known as Spring Creek Land and Gravel and that, because of Gum’s financial and marital problems, Schaefer purchased Gum’s interest in the partnership. 1 The terms of the purchase were set forth in a written agreement on August 6, 1982. Eight months later, Gum attempted to repurchase his partnership interest from Schaefer, alleging that the parties had, in conjunction with their…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Archer v. GriffithTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Texas Bank and Trust Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Compton v. HenrieTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stephens County Museum, Inc. v. SwensonTexas Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by35 opinions

  1. Cortez Ex Rel. Estate of Puentes v. HCCI-San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Texas Department of Human Services v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Perez v. Kirk & Carrigan, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  4. Kiefer v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  5. Sullemon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API