Legal Opinion
State v. Horton
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 16, 2006No. 24381-8-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
146 P.3d 1227 (2006)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Kris Alan HORTON, Appellant.
No. 24381-8-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
November 16, 2006.
Terry Jay Bloor, Benton County Prosecutors Office, Kennewick, WA, for Respondent.
Janet G. Gemberling, Gemberling & Dooris PS, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
SWEENEY, C.J.
¶ 1 A Terry[1] frisk is a well-recognized exception to the usual requirement of probable cause and a search warrant. But the scope of a Terry frisk is limited to objects that might be used as weapons. We conclude that this does not include a cigarette pack. And we therefore…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2014