Legal Opinion

State v. Horton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 16, 2006No. 24381-8-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 A Terry1 frisk is a well-recognized exception to the usual requirement of probable cause and a search warrant. But the scope of a Terry frisk is limited to objects that might be used as weapons. We conclude that this does not include a cigarette pack. And we therefore hold that Kris Alan Horton’s lawyer was ineffective for failing to move to suppress the drug evidence supporting Mr. Horton’s conviction for possession with intent to manufacture and simple possession of methamphetamine. We therefore reverse his convictions for those charges.

Sweeney, C.J.

FACTS

¶2 A sheriff’s deputy was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State Of Washington v. Tanner Z. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API