State v. Kirkman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 — Petitioner State of Washington appeals two Court of Appeals’ opinions reversing jury con*922victions. Respondent Charles L. Kirkman was convicted of first degree rape of an eight-year-old girl. Respondent Ruben Jaurez Candía was convicted on four counts of first degree rape of a child. The combined cases raise the common issue of whether a trial court allowed testimony of an investigating officer or examining doctor, argued to be improper, as supporting the victims’ credibility and, if so, whether the error was “manifest” constitutional error that may be asserted for the first time on appeal.
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by357 opinions
- State v. O'HaraWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.