Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1892PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Despondent was convicted of a violation of the local option law. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The respondent was convicted in the Van Burén circuit court on an information charging that he did on the 28th day of November, 1891—

“ Then and there sell and furnish to one Myron C. Dolbie a certain quantity of spirituous and intoxicating *42liquors, to wit, one-half pint of brandy, he, the said Matthew Murphy, not being a druggist or registered pharmacist selling such' liquor under and in compliance with the restrictions and requirements imposed upon druggists and registered pharmacists by the general laws of the State of Michigan, but contrary to the provisions of a certain resolution adopted…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. People v. KarcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hyde v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. LittooyWashington Supreme Court · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API