Legal Opinion

City of Memphis v. Southern Ry. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This is a controversy between the city of Memphis and the Southern Railway Company over the liability for the cost of the construction of a bridge or trestle carrying tracks of the railway company over the extension of one of the streets within that city. The trial judge apportioned the expenses between the two parties in a manner which satisfied neither, and both have appealed. Certain constitutional questions 'áre raised, and the case has been brought directly to this court.

Prior to August 30', 1921, Linden avenue ran up to the right of way of the Southern Bailway on either side. The tracks…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Malone v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Dyer County v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Memphis State Line Railroad v. Forest Hill Cemetery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Farmer v. Mayor of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Raleigh v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. City of Paris v. Paris-Henry County Public Utility DistrictTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. The Town of Collierville, Tennessee, Schilling, Inc., Jane Porter Feild, and Joel H. Porter v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. BakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API