Legal Opinion

Dyer County v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1889PublishedCited by 30 opinions

FROM DYER. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Dyer County. H. J. Livingston, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

In the construction of its road through Dyer County some years ago, the Paducah and Memphis Eailroad Company made' a deep cut in a hill over which the public road from Dyers-burg to Trenton ran, and at the point of intersection erected an overhead bridge across the cut for the use of persons traveling upon the public road. After ten or twelve years of use by the pub-*714lie the bridge fell into decay, became dangerous, and was taken down. In the meantime the defendants in this cause became the successors of that company, and took charge of its road. They failing and refusing to ' replace the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eyler v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  2. People ex rel. City of Bloomington v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. MoffittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Worster v. Forty-Second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. American Tobacco Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. City of Indianapolis v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Tennessee Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API