City of Raleigh v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is based on the principles set forth in Winston-Salem v. Southern Ry., 248 N.C. 637, 105 S.E. 2d 37.
The majority view in this country recognizes that an ordinance 'in the interest of public safety, convenience or welfare which requires a railroad to construct or reconstruct, at its expense, passageways over or under streets and highways, without regard to which was first in existence, is a reasonable exercise of the police power. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. v. Public Utilities Commission, 346 U.S. 346, 98 L. Ed. 51, 74 S. Ct. 92; Erie R. R. v. Board of Public…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Sharpe v. Park Newspapers of Lumberton, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.