Legal Opinion

Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. v. Baker

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

By chapter 132, Public Acts of 1921; chapter 3'5, Public Acts of 1923; chapter 88, Public Acts of 1925; Code, section 2638 et seq., it was provided that — •

“The state department of highways through its commissioner, shall have the power to. eliminate grade crossings of any railroad or interurban railway track on any of the main traveled roads designated by the commissioner as included in the general highway plan of the State, whenever, in the discretion of the said commissioner, the elimination of any such grade crossing is necessary for the protection of persons traveling on any such highway…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Henley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. State ex rel. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. State v. LindsayTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Gaines v. Tennessee Cent. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  3. City of Tulsa v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  4. Estep v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Application of ShadidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API