Malone v. Williams
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. — ■ F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor,
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil
The hill in this case was filed by certain persons who were elected as officers of the city of Memphis under its charter, as it existed prior to March 27, 1907, against certain other persons claiming to he officers of the same city by appointment of the governor under an act passed on the date last mentioned.. The purpose of the hill was to have the above-mentioned act of March 27,1907 (Senate Bill No. 289), declared unconstitutional and void.
It is alleged that the act referred to was first introduced as an independent act, imposing upon the city of Memphis a new charter^ and that thisAct…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
- C. C. Clark and Others v. . E. R. Stanley and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Motlow v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Scott v. Nashville Bridge Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- State Highway Department v. Montgomery Mitchell's HeirsTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- King County Water District No. 54 v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1976
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.