Legal Opinion

Muse-Art Corp. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1953No. Appeal, 241PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff corporation seeks to restrain the defendant city “from taking affirmative action to enforce the collection of certain moneys which the City claimed were due from the plaintiff” as the licensee of “rights and privileges” granted under the city’s Sound Reproduction License Ordinance of 1945. After a hearing on the merits, the chancellor filed an adjudication and decree nisi dismissing the bill at the plaintiff’s costs. Exceptions by the plaintiff were overruled in a thorough and well considered opinion by the learned chancellor acting for the court en…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. RinalducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Schline v. KineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Owl Protective Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Irrera v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Lakewood Memorial Gardens, Inc. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Weaverland Independent School District CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API