Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Chidsey,
Plaintiff appellant brought this action in assumpsit to compel defendant corporation to account for the profits realized from a coal stripping operation and to pay plaintiff 50 per cent thereof. The case was tried before a jury and resulted in a disagreement. Pursuant to defendant’s motion, the court below in a unanimous decision entered judgment upon the whole record in favor of the defendant, under the provisions of the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70, 12 PS §684. Plaintiff thereupon took this appeal. In reviewing the record we will consider the facts and the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McLaughlin v. MonaghanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Upsal Street Realty Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Berkowitz v. KassSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Flegal v. HooverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Krebs v. United Refining Co. of PennsylvaniaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.