Legal Opinion

Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 85 v. Port Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1965No. Appeal, No. 80PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

This appeal is from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County directing appellant, the Port Authority of Allegheny County, to comply with arbitration provisions of the Second Class County Port Authority Act.1 The decree directs the Port Authority to submit to arbitration its labor dispute with appellee union, the recognized bargaining agent for appellant’s employees.

Neither the complaint in mandamus nor the answer raise any factual issues and appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted by the court below.

The facts are not disputed.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Tranter v. Alleghency County Co. AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. National Transit Co. v. BoardmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Zimmerman v. O'BANNONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Koken v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Tyler v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. SojournerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API