Legal Opinion

McVitty v. Flentge

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1917No. 2188PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. -

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in the defendant’s favor after motion for nonsuit granted.

The action was for unlawful detainer. The defendant was in possession of the premises in question under a lease for the term of three years commencing November 1, 1915, at an annual cash rental of $110, payable yearly in advance. The plaintiff is the successor in interest of one Otto L. Harden, the lessor of the premises, having purchased the same from him, the conveyance thereof being delivered to said plaintiff on January 22, 1917. The 'lease under which the defendant claims the right to hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Diepenbrock v. LuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cashau v. Northwestern Nat. Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1873
  4. First National Bank v. HaugSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Putnam v. PutnamMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wilson v. BeazleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Garetson v. HesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Upton v. TothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Fallek v. Central Desk Safe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API