Diepenbrock v. Luiz
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This cause was decided by the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, and a rehearing was granted in order that we might further examine the authorities applicable to the lease involved in the litigation. After careful examination of the authorities cited and of the arguments of counsel presented in their briefs, we have adopted the opinion of the district court of appeal, written by Mr. Justice Burnett, which is as follows:—
“The action, based upon a lease of agricultural lands from one R. W. Brown to defendant, is to recover the rental which under the terms of said lease…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stanley v. ColtSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hartung v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Antonelle v. Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
- De Vitt v. Kaufman CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mott v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Jacobsen v. KatzerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Lucy v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Nelson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Fahrenbaker v. E. Clemens Horst Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.