Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Putnam

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1929No. 6,503PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an action for divorce. Plaintiff’s first cause of action is based upon cruelty; the second upon desertion. Defendant’s answer consists of denials and explanations. She interposed a cross-complaint, charging plaintiff with desertion, asking for separate maintenance. The court found for the plaintiff, granted him a decree of divorce, denied defendant separate maintenanee. Defendant appealed.

The specifications of error are that the court erred in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint and each of the causes thereof, in overruling defendant’s objection to the introduction of any…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Casey v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Chmielewska v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wilson v. BlairMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Remington v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Batchoff v. CraneyMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Vaughn & Ragsdale Co. v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Conley v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API