Legal Opinion

Ocean Shore Railroad Co. v. Doelger

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1954No. Civ. 15597PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

All parties appeal from the judgment. Additionally, plaintiff moves to augment the record.

Questions Presented

1. Whether the so-called Buck decree determined plaintiff’s ownership to be in fee rather than an easement.

2. The situation as to the fills supporting the right of way.

3. Is the Buck decree res judicata of the question of abandonment ?

Record

Plaintiff sued for damages and to enjoin trespass, alleging ownership and right to possession of a described 60-foot strip of land in San Mateo County, and ownership of an easement of support and exclusive right to possession of 70-foot strips of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Uhl v. Ohio River RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Guardianship of SnowballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Sherman v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Ocean Shore Railroad Co. v. DoelgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API