Uhl v. Ohio River Railroad
West Virginia Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court;, Wood County. Action by C. D. Ubl against the Ohio River Railroad Company and others. From an order refusing to dissolve an injunetion, defendant company appeals!
1Opinion of the Court
Brannon, Judge:
An agreement was made between Charles D. Uhl and The Wheeling, Parkersburg & Charleston Eailroad Company, the name of which was changed to The Ohio Eiver Eailroad Company, which agreement reads as follows: “This agreement made this 13th day of April, 1882, between Charles D. Uhl, of the conntj'- of Wood, West Virginia, of the first part, and The Wheeling, Parkersburg & Charleston Eailway Company, a corporation under the laws of West Virginia, of the second part, Witnesseth: That whereas the said railway company proposes to construct and build its road through the said county of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Wolcott v. Des Moines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GeiselIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
- Jones v. Van BochoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Kanawha Banking & Trust Co. v. GilbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
- Stevens v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Quinn v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Faith United Methodist Church & Cemetery of Terra Alta v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.