Legal Opinion

Webb v. City of Bloomington

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1974No. 1-673A123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, P.J.

The plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter collectively referred to as Webb) were remonstrators of a purported annexation resulting from passage of Ordinance 67-5 by the city council of the defendant-appellee (City). The trial court phase of this litigation was terminated when the City’s motion to dismiss was granted by the trial judge after Ordinance 67-5 was repealed.

A summary of the issues raised in Webb’s overruled motion to correct errors alleges that there was error in failing to grant either of two motions for summary judgment; there was error in dismissing the cause of action (including a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Vesenmeir v. City of Aurora, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Reafsnyder v. City of WarsawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. City of Indianapolis v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hewitt v. MillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Besso v. Town of PorterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Town of Porter v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Abbott v. AbbottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API