Legal Opinion
Browning v. Walters
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided September 7, 1993No. 77A01-9207-CV-214PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
NAJAM, Judge.
Melvin Browning petitions this court for rehearing after our opinion in which we affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Browning's complaint. See Browning v. Walters (1993), Ind.App., 616 N.E.2d 1040. For the reasons stated below, we grant Browning's petition in part and deny it in part. On rehearing, we address the following issues:
1. Whether Browning's Reply Brief was timely filed.
2. Whether the failure to verify a derivative action complaint as required by Trial Rule 28.1 is a jurisdictional defect.
3. Whether the trial court erred by dismissing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rumfelt v. HimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Harp v. Indiana Department of HighwaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- City of Marion v. AntrobusIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Eggers v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Troxel v. TroxelIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Prime Mortgage USA, Inc. v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. SwigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Indiana Insurance Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.