Legal Opinion
Town of Porter v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 1983No. 3-982A233PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Defendants-appellants Town of Porter, et al (Town) appeal from an order of the Porter Superior Court granting plaintiffs-ap-pellees Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem), Northern Indiana Public Service Company (NIPSCO) and Chicago South Shore & South Bend Railroad (Railroad) summary judgment upon their objection to the Town's second annexation attempt of certain property in violation of the two-year moratorium statute found under Ind. Code 18-5-10-26 (1976 ed.).1
We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
On May 27, 1980, the Town enacted Ordinance No. 656 to annex…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- F. W. Means & Co. v. CarstensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Burks v. BolerjackIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Wallace v. Indiana InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Annexation Proposed by Annexation Ordinance Number X-07-91Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000