Legal Opinion
Oldham v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 7, 2007No. 07-1087PublishedCited by 580 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Dee Oldham appeals the decision of the district court affirming the denial by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) of her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (Act). Because the decision of the ALJ was supported by substantial evidence and the law was properly applied, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Ms. Oldham claims to have been disabled since February 1995 as a result of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) 1 , seizures, and memory problems. In his initial decision the ALJ determined that Ms. Oldham did not have any severe impairments.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Grogan v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hackett v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Watkins v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- William T. WINFREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by580 opinions
- Allman v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Hendron v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Mays v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Newbold v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Brownrigg v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
575 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.