Legal Opinion
Hamlin v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2004No. 02-7087PublishedCited by 703 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Edward Hamlin seeks review of a denial of disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. Mr. Hamlin filed for benefits in 1993. An administrative law judge (ALJ) denied his claim, and both the Appeals Council and the district court affirmed the ALJ’s decision. Mr. Hamlin appeals, raising the same issues he posed before the district court.' Essentially he contends the ALJ’s rejection of his disability claim was not based on substantial evidence. Specifically, Mr. Hamlin asserts the ALJ erred in finding he had a residual function capacity (RFC)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Danny CLIFTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- William MORALES, Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- David W. Musgrave v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by703 opinions
- Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Chapo v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Haga v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Krauser v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Noreja v. Commissioner, SSACourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
698 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.