Legal Opinion

Hazel M. Meerdink v. Irma Ott v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Garnishee-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 30, 1962No. 13891_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a summary judgment entered in a garnishment proceeding initiated by the plaintiff after her recovery of a judgment against the defendant in an action for personal injuries. The defendant is not a party to this appeal. A brief recital of the history of the litigation will place the questions raised in proper context.

The plaintiff, a domestic servant and companion in the employ of the defendant, accompanied her employer on a vacation trip to California. While a passenger in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant, the plaintiff sustained…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Maxson v. McElhinneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Chakmakjian v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barrett v. Transformer Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Draft Systems, Inc. v. AlspachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Draft Systems, Inc. v. AlspachCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Hazel M. Meerdink v. Irma Ott v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API