Legal Opinion

Chakmakjian v. Lowe

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1949No. L. A. 20659PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Defendant, an uninsured employer, appeals from a judgment for plaintiff rendered on account of injuries sustained by plaintiff while in defendant’s employ. As grounds for reversal defendant urges: (1) the charge of plaintiff’s double recovery because in subsequent proceedings before the *310Industrial Accident Commission in adjustment of his compensation claim, plaintiff obtained an award exceeding by a few hundred dollars the amount of the judgment here assailed ; and (2) the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the court’s finding of negligence in the adjudication of defendant’s liability.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Westberg v. WilldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Gigliotti v. NunesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Torres v. ReardonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API