Legal Opinion

Laroche v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1939No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Steen,

George Grove and Benjamin Grove, brothers living at or near Patuxent, Maryland, worked as truck drivers for their father. Each owned an automobile. On May 27, 1937, George, whose car was disabled, asked Benjamin if he might use the latter’s automobile the next day to go to Washington. Benjamin consented.

As the case turns upon the terms of the permission thus granted, all of the testimony in regard to it is here given. Benjamin Grove testified as follows: “Q. What did he say to you on that occasion with respect to the use of your car the next day? A. He asked me if…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  2. Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Orcutt v. Erie Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Ferguson v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Randig v. O'Hara (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Hodges v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Moffat v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Brugnoli v. United National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Speier Et Ux. v. AylingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API