Draft Systems, Inc. v. Alspach
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this case, the district court held that an insurance company which furnished a defense to a putative insured was estopped to assert lack of coverage even though the parties had executed a non-waiver agreement. Finding that conclusion inconsistent with applicable state law, we will vacate and remand for further proceedings.
After a bench trial, the court issued a declaratory judgment that the Continental Insurance Company was liable for a judgment that had been entered against the Rimar Manufacturing Company in an earlier but related suit. The court…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- APPALACHIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- George Bartholomew v. Appalachian Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Walbrook Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Goshgarian & GoshgarianDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989
- Beckwith MacHinery Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
- Schoffstall v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Anderson v. National Chiropractic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.