Legal Opinion

Askins v. Overholser

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 24, 1948No. 9565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Associate Justice:

This is a motion by the appellant Askins for reconsideration of an order entered by this court on August 6, 1947, and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The order of August 6 denied a motion theretofore made by Askins to be allowed to proceed on appeal on an “agreed” statement of evidence. For an understanding of the present motion a survey of previous proceedings is necessary:

Askins was indicted by a grand jury in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia for murder in the first degree. Upon an inquiry into his sanity he was found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Overholser v. De MarcosCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Waterman v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. Spruill v. Temple Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Maynard Dare Parsell and Melvin West Parsell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Crouch v. TrumanArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re WT Grant Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
  4. Belt v. HoltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  5. American Chicle Co. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API