Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Truman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1958No. 6680PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

H. A. and H. D. Pixler dba H. A. Pixler & Son filed suit in the superior court of Pinal county and was awarded judgment against William J. Crouch in the sum of $2,500 plus $800 attorney fees. On appeal, Crouch v. Pixler, 83 Ariz. 310, 320 P.2d 943, 946, this court affirmed the judgment as to the $2,500 and reversed as to the attorney fees in the following language:

“The judgment as to the $2,500 is affirmed, and reversed as to the $800 attorney’s fees.”

The Pixlers moved for rehearing requesting us to modify and amplify the decision so as to remand the case to the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Askins v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  4. Bayuk v. FeldmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Woods v. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque, N. M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Day v. Estate of WiswallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. United Dairymen of Arizona v. SchuggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. State v. MichaelArizona Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API