Crouch v. Truman
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINDES, Justice.
H. A. and H. D. Pixler dba H. A. Pixler & Son filed suit in the superior court of Pinal county and was awarded judgment against William J. Crouch in the sum of $2,500 plus $800 attorney fees. On appeal, Crouch v. Pixler, 83 Ariz. 310, 320 P.2d 943, 946, this court affirmed the judgment as to the $2,500 and reversed as to the attorney fees in the following language:
“The judgment as to the $2,500 is affirmed, and reversed as to the $800 attorney’s fees.”
The Pixlers moved for rehearing requesting us to modify and amplify the decision so as to remand the case to the trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crouch v. PixlerArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Esmele v. Violet Trapping Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Askins v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
- Bayuk v. FeldmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Woods v. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque, N. M.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Day v. Estate of WiswallArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Shetter v. RochelleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- A.R. Teeters & Associates, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- United Dairymen of Arizona v. SchuggCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- State v. MichaelArizona Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.