Legal Opinion

Spruill v. Temple Baptist Church

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 31, 1944No. Misc. No. 41PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In the case of Waterman v. McMillan,1 this cour-t interpreted the statute relating to appeals in forma pauperis and outlined the procedure to be followed in presenting such an application to this court. Among other things, we said—following the guidance of the Supreme Court in Wells v. United States2—“The purpose of the statute is that the application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by the affidavit, should promptly be made to the District Court, in the first instance, to enable that court, with its full and immediate knowledge of the facts, to determine whether the appeal has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Waterman v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  3. Murrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. McGrew v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Bates v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Johnson v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Norvin G. Maloney, Jr. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. Askins v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  5. Spruill v. BrooksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API