Overholser v. De Marcos
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Associate Justice.
The respondent, Superintendent of St. Elizabeths Hospital, appeals from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding discharging the petitioner from custody on the ground that petitioner is sane. In his answer respondent states that petitioner has been under the care and observation of physicians on the staff of St. Elizabeths Hospital, to which he was committed in accordance with law, that he is suffering from paranoia to such an extent as to be dangerous to himself and others if released.
At the hearing both the United States Attorney and the court below assumed that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- De Marcos v. OverholserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Barry v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Loren R. Gajewski and Mervin A. Gajewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Private Brands, Inc., and Francis P. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Frank Egan v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.