Legal Opinion

Mox Incorporated v. Woods

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8861PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff corporation from judgment dismissing from the action certain defendants, following order sustaining general demurrers separately interposed by them, plaintiff having declined to amend. The defendants who had judgment are Frank E. Woods and Nancy E. Woods, husband and wife, and Bank of America, a corporation.

The complaint attempts, and we think successfully, to plead damages as the result of a civil conspiracy, to wit, a conspiracy to inflict damages by wrongful acts. We are not concerned with the question of the ability of the plaintiff to prove the allegations…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  4. More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Davitt v. American Bakers' UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Doctors' Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API