Legal Opinion

Bailey v. OWEN ELECTRIC STEEL CO. OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 29, 1990No. 23223PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Drayton King Bailey (Bailey) commenced this negligence action against Respondent Owen Electric Steel Company (Owen) for injuries he sustained while working on Owen’s premises. We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of Circuit Court orders (1) denying as premature Bailey’s motion to compel discovery and (2) dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Bailey v. Owen Elec. Steel Co., 298 S.C. 36, 378 S.E. (2d) 63 (Ct. App. 1989). We now reverse and remand to the Circuit Court for a determination on the merits of the motion to compel.

On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  3. In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  4. Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  5. Bailey v. OWEN ELECTRIC STEEL CO. OF SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glass v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Carter v. FLORENTINE CORPORATION, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Gentry ex rel. Estate of Gentry v. Milliken & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API