Legal Opinion

Carter v. FLORENTINE CORPORATION, INC.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1992No. 23716PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

Florentine Corporation (Florentine) appeals a Summary Judgment Order which held that Respondent, Dozier Carter (Carter), was not a statutory employee and, therefore, could maintain a civil negligence action.

We reverse.

FACTS

Florentine is a South Carolina corporation owned by a single shareholder. Its sole asset is the land and buildings comprising Magnolia Mall in Florence.

The Mall is managed by Equity Property Management Corporation (Equity). The management contract between Equity and Florentine requires that Equity (1) hire and discharge all Magnolia Mall employees, (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ost v. Integrated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Smith v. T.H. Snipes & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Simms v. PhillipsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. Bailey v. OWEN ELECTRIC STEEL CO. OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. McCreery v. Covenant Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Carrier v. Westvaco Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  3. Woodard v. Westvaco Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Harrell v. Pineland Plantation, Ltd.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management OfficeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API