Legal Opinion

Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1987No. C9-87-358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Naemi Demning filed suit against her insurer, respondent Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance, seeking no-fault economic loss benefits for injuries she suffered in an automobile accident. The trial court ruled that she was entitled to the benefits, but that they were offset by social security disability benefits she had been receiving. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and modify.

FACTS

Naemi Demning held various full-time jobs for most of the period from 1953 to 1976. In the fall of 1976, however, she was diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis and was forced to quit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Peterson v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. McKenzie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API