Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1977No. 46829PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS J. STAHLER, Justice. *

Plaintiff, Roger A. Peterson, brought this action to recover damages for alleged fraud in a real estate transaction. The district court, sitting without a jury, made findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to defendants. Plaintiff appeals from a denial of his motion for amended findings, or in the alternative, for a new trial. We affirm.

Defendant Robert B. Johnston (Johnston) is a real estate broker and president of defendant Robert B. Johnston, Inc., a real estate company. Defendant The Realty House, Inc., is a corporation owned by approximately 10 real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Tysk v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Marion v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Jensen v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Stiff v. Associated Sewing Supply Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API