Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1989No. C8-89-257PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) appeals that portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding respondent Rae Anne McKenzie $6,475.42 in no-fault income loss benefits. The trial court determined that McKenzie’s injuries, sustained as a result of an automobile accident, prevented her from working on a regular basis, thus entitling her to income loss benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Rae Anne McKenzie began work as a full-time legal secretary in 1970. She worked full time until 1972 when she gave birth to her only daughter. For the next two years…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ford v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Northern State Bank of Thief River Falls v. EftelandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Darby v. American Family Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Demning v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erickson v. Great American Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Arbitration of Keim v. Farm Bureau Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992