Legal Opinion

Aristocrat Highway Displays, Inc. v. Stricklen

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1945No. Civ. No. 3171PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action to recover the rental of two highway advertising signs which plaintiff erected for defendant on Highway 99, north and south of Bakersfield.

The written contract was dated October 14, 1941, and provided that defendant pay plaintiff $75 per month for thirty-six months for the use of the signs. It contained an acceleration clause in the event of failure to pay the monthly rental and also the following :

“Total number of displays 2. Illuminated 1 Yes. . . . Any loss of advertising, damages or delays caused by the Act of God, strikes,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mitchell v. Ceazan Tires, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Leonard v. RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. PerscalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Dorn v. GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Kennedy v. ReeceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API